Research in social action, discrimination,
psycho-social action
Amy’s Social Action: “World Work And The Politics Of Dreaming”
In this 25 page article, Amy Mindell comes out of the closet :-) with her politics of dreaming. Written for the intellectual and also for the artistic mind, focused as well on the general public, Amy clearly makes her point.
The world is run without awareness or consciousness of the deepest, most creative parts of our souls. That is, Dreaming is an organic and necessary element of all world process. Dreaming changes group atmosphere, deepens interactions and creates sustainable change.
Download
"World Work and the Politics of Dreaming" (2.6MB)

"Bridge-Building Between People Of Differing Religious Ideologies."
An Unedited Interview With Amy and Arny Mindell, www.aamindell.net,
by MS Linda Ceriello braveboldnow@yahoo.com
12/26/2007
We appreciate Ms Linda Ceriello for her interest in bridging gaps between people of different belief systems. Her interview refers to a large open city forum, that occurred in Portland, Oregon several years ago. That forum was created by the Process Work Institute of Portland. Amy and Arny were co facilitators. The theme was about the relationship between the Oregon Citizens alliance, (a conservative Christian political activist organization) and Lesbian and Gay Rights. Her interview with A+A was excerpted from a longer interview. See the attached file, worldwork and religion.
Download
"World Work and Religion " (78kb)

Conflicts Around Issues of Race reported by the San Francisco Chronicle
Thanks to the late Ms. Wilma Jean Tucker for having created the Oakland California open forum setting. Because of her, we were able to process some of the public’s feelings, both the hurt and heartfulness connected to racial issues in the United States. This forum occurred just before the “Rodney King Trial”, 1992. Mr King had been unfairly beaten by police, in a widely publicized video, sent by TV around the world at that time. A few days before the trial, the public atmosphere in Oakland California, was highly charge just as other largely African American cities were around the US. For some amazing reason, Oakland was one of the few places which did not break out into riots after that trial.
We hope that the large open forum gathering and people’s ability to express and deeply relate to one another, may have contributed to the possible outer lack of riots. Our hope is that learning to process large open public forums on difficult, historical topics, may contribute to a better world for everyone. See the attached link San Francisco Chronicle article by Mr Don Lattin who reported on that forum. (because the newspaper article was difficult to scan, the text is reproduced from the original. Click here to see the article.
Download
the article (297kb)

Why "white" instead of "White" people?
A reader of Arny’s Sitting in the Fire, recently asked about Chapter 3 which discusses rank. She wanted to know why Arny capitalized the names of many peoples, such as Aboriginal Australians, Latinos, Africans, Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, but did not capitalize whites?
The answer is that in the mid 1990’s, Arny was (and still is) trying to compensate for the overwhelming rank given to white people over others in many parts of the world. But the more complete answer is that compensating for rank, by lowering one’s status (e.g. from White to white) is only the beginning of social action. It is not sustainable, because in the grandest sense of deep democracy which includes all worlds, everyone has equal value. Moreover, every experiential level has equal value, (even if we still occasionally emphasize Dreaming over consensus reality :-) ).

Voodoo.
While studying the magical culture of “hoodoo” from New Orleans and its origins in Voodoo from West Africa, we came across a few minute video about “Togo voodoo”. Click this National Geographic production to see aspects of this essential African religion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNh3_JxP3HM. This reminds us of experiences we had in Africa in the 1980’s, experiences which were behind Arny’s SHAMAN’S BODY.

Our Planetary Future and "Universe Work"
We are thinking about individual, relationship, team and world work, as well as about “universe work.” What is and will happen to our little planet in the next several hundred years and in the eventual future. We are pondering the danger of global warming, the influence of human action, and volcanoes on global warming. We are pondering genetic manipulation getting into the hands of warring cultures. It is going to be easier in the future not only to produce medicine but genetically organized diseases.
On the consensus reality level, reducing conflict, controlling overpopulation, reducing environmental destruction can help if we learn how to get along with one another. Once again; we need more research and practice in how to deal with conflict.


New Orleans: Reconstruction and Dialogue about Class and Race
In preparing for our worldwork facilitator training in New Orleans in the fall of 2007, we are studying the complex process of city rebuilding. This process includes the connections between intercultural dialogue and the power of the environment as it manifests for example in hurricanes, tsunamis, and earthquakes. We are revising our thinking about what it means to care for our fragile human well being and social equality, while remembering nature. What are the roles and the marginalized “ghost”roles, in the city, state, country…and planet?

Worldwork Perspectives
We are enjoying the worldwork insights of various colleagues.
See Dr. Max Schupbach’s innovative applications of the worldwork paradigm.
Read also Dr. Gary Reiss’ book, “Beyond War and Peace in the Arab Israeli Conflict”.
We love reading Dawn Menken’s innovative “Speak Out.”
Dr. Arlene Audergon’s, good book, “THE WAR HOTEL.” It weaves processwork together with social consciousness to show how to deal with war and its results.


Discourse
And Process Theories: Seyla Benhabib and Arnold Mindell
By Professor J.J. Hendricks,
California State University,
Stanislaus Department of Politics and Public Administration
Introduction
This paper examines the points of agreement and
difference between two theorists who address similar themes in very
different milieus, coming
from different perspectives and disciplines. One of the theorists, Arnold
Mindell would call this a bootstrap paper discussing two bootstrap theories.
Seyla Benhabib's stated philosophical project is "to situate reason
and the moral self in contexts of gender and community , while insisting
of the discursive power of individuals to challenge such situatedness
in the name of future identities and communities, and universalistic
principles."
1 A critical theorist, Benhabib extends Habermas'
discourse theory by reconstituting it phenomenologically though insights
gleaned from Hannah
Arendt and Carol Gilligan. She intends to capture a pragmatic, yet utopian
vision of reflexivity and radical egalitarianism through the moral conversation,
and further, she extends the options for the marginalized in challenging
their situatedness as mentioned above. She situates discourse theory, "between
liberalism and communitarianism, Kantian universalism and Hegelian Sittlihkeit."
2 Arnold Mindell's is a theory of emergence.
3 His stated psychological goal is "to develop
skills and methods for working with the emerging world situation: a
planet with five thousand
different languages and religions whose inhabitants know more about launching
spaceships than about getting
along with each other. This form of process psychology is world work - an
interdisciplinary method that helps small and large groups of people to live,
work and grow together within their environment. The challenge is to develop
organizational and conflict resolution so that they reflect democratic principles
and are widely applicable.
4 Mindell draws on modern psychology - "the
Jungian method of following the unconscious, the Gestalt focus on process,
Carl Rogers unconditional
support for the individual, the transpersonal focus on the divine, and
the systems principles from economics, politics and physics."
5 His primary influences are Jung, physics and the Tao. He too, is interested
in extending options for expression of voices left out of the discussion.
Download
the rest of the paper .... (81kb)


Central
world challenges
1. Mind and Body
Experience shows neglecting a part of yourself makes it appear as an inner
problem, outer anxiety or body symptom.
What you can do:
I. Use awareness, accept your diversity of images and dreams
II. Encourage medicine and psychology to cross their boundaries and come
together to match your inner experience.
2. World Problems
If you or your group marginalizes a person or feeling, that person or feeling
becomes a problem later on, or a group which attacks yours.
What you can do:
I. Consider how you are the other.
II. Encourage democratic theory and practice to deepen by using awareness
methods.
3. World Problem 2003: Transform
Groups into Democracies.
Very few of us are democratic enough to give equal representation to all
our inner and outer parts.
What you can do.
I. Use awareness, notice your feelings, and become more deeply democratic.
II. Practice awareness of the "other" in groups
III. Realize, you can't make a group democratic, but you can discover that
with awareness, all people are deeply democratic. It's our basic nature.
(see Arny's "Deep Democracy of Open Forums" for methods.)
4. World Ghosts 2003: Weapons of Mass Destruction
When terrorists and others "harboring" weapons
of mass destruction become invisible, they become ghost roles; that is
nonlocal stuff in the
air.
What this means and what you can do:
I. Ask yourself why you sometimes want to wipe out the human race.
II. Notice "weapons of mass destruction" in groups when people
are ready to "kill" one another.
III. Consider SARS disease as a ghost role, a nonlocal weapon of mass destruction.
Become a shaman and play that role (and make it meaningful) to ameliorate
its consequences.


Oneness
and diversity questions 
When you wake up in the middle of the night, and
see something hanging over a chair, it can be a monster or goddess at the
same time. But then "awakening",
you realize it is just your old shirt you threw over the chair before you
went to bed. In the quantum realm of physics, a consensual physics object
such as a shirt, can be in two states at the same time. Likewise in psychology,
in a sleepy state, we can see two different states of a "shirt" at the same
time.

|